Think Tank

Please reply to the post below.

1-  What rights does Bonsetti have (in most states) as a minority shareholder dissenting to the merger of GVG and Hula Boards?  In most states, the rights of minority shareholders like Bonsetti are outlined in procedures such as the Revised Model Business Corporation Act (RMBCA), which sets several requirements for mergers and consolidations (Miller 828). As a member of the board of directors of Gnarly Vulcan Gear, Inc. (GVG), Bonsetti has a right to approve or disapprove of any mergers or consolidations. 
2-  Could the parties have used a short-form merger procedure in this situation? Why or why not? In this case, the parties could not have formed a short-form merger as the RMCBA 11.04 requires the parent company to have ownership of over 90% of shares in the subsidiary corporation (Miller 830). Bonsetti still owns the majority of GVG’s total shares, thus preventing the procedure.
3- What is the term used for Hula’s offer to purchase GVG stock? Hula’s offer is considered a tender offer as Mai Jin Li offered to buy GVG stock at 30% above the market price per share (Miller 833).
4- Suppose that after the merger, a person who was injured on the Baked Chameleon board sued Hula (the surviving corporation). Can Hula be held liable for the injury? Why or why not. After Hula and GVG’s merger, Hula, as the surviving company is liable for GVG’s obligations and debts (Miller 827). Therefore, the corporation can be held liable for the injury.
The general language of corporate takeover laws in the United States gives substantial freedom to both the targets of acquisition and acquirers by allowing the latter to make offers and the former to accept or take defensive measures (Magnuson 206). The defensive strategies against takeovers stipulated in corporate law include the William Act, Business Combination (BC), Poison Pill (PP), Fair Price, and Control Share Acquisition (Pierce and Robinson 18). The Williams Act of 1968 began the modern era of regulations governing takeovers and inspired more rules in the same field (Magnuson 213). It mainly requires information disclosure by the acquiring corporations and sets up rules to regulate tender offers. While some of these methods have loopholes, such as the increase in the probability of hostile takeovers after PP validation, other methods such as BC are integral in significantly reducing hostile combinations (Cain et al. 5). Given the benefit in information disclosure and restraining-hostile environments, corporate law should not be amended to bar anti-takeover strategies. However, they can be amended to address the loopholes.  
Works Cited
Cain, Matthew D, et al. “Do Takeover Laws Matter? Evidence from Five Decades of Hostile Takeovers.” DERA Working Paper Series, 2014,  laws.pdf.
Magnuson, William. “Takeover Regulation in the United States and Europe: An Institutional       Approach.” Pace International Law Review, vol. 21, no. 205, 2009, pp. 205-39.
Miller, Roger L. Business Law Today. 12th ed., Cengage Learning, 2020.

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more