Please read 3 peer-reviewed papers pertaining to your project (obviously theseessayblazers.com

2022-05-28 09:56:07Please read 3 peer-reviewed papers pertaining to your project (obviously theseessayblazers.com
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable ratesFor This or a Similar Paper Click To Order NowPlease read 3 peer-reviewed papers pertaining to your project (obviously these must not be the same 3 as Lit. Review 1), and submit 1.5-2 pages discussing the papers and their relationship to one another.Background papers that help you understand your project topic are also OK. The structure is flexible, but you could for example write one paragraph about each and then relate them in two or three longer paragraphs. Review papers and original research articles are both fine. Google Scholar is a great resource for finding these. You are of course allowed to include more than 3 papers if it would benefit the passage you want to write, but make sure you’ve read three in depth.The goal of thisassignment is to practice writing about papers in relationship to one another. Generally when you read scientific introductions, you won’t see the authors just summarize a single paper. Instead, they’ll talk about how sets of papers relate to one another and to the topic at hand.This turns out to be way more fun and creative than just summarizing a single paper, since there are many different ways to think about how a set of papers relates to one another and to a particular topic. This is an individual assignment, but it’s totally OK to discuss tricky figures/methods in your papers with other folks in your group and the broader class. Each group member should find their own 3 papers to review.Some examples: — Read three papers about software tools/algorithms that do the sametask (e.g. the MUSCLE, MAFFT, and CLUSTAL papers), and compare and contrast their approaches, accuracy (if they did benchmarking), etc.— Read a theoretical paper that makes predictions, a software paper that implements them, and a results paper that applies the software to real data. — Read three theoretical papers and consider what data/analyses/experiments would distinguish their predictions. — Read three research papers asking similar question, and try to work out what results they agree on (that may represent a general trend). Where they disagree, is there a clear reason for the disagreement? What types of data or experiments do you think could resolve it?— For a multi-step process like phylogenetic inference, genome sequencing, or microbial community analysis, read a paper (or papers) pertaining to each step.A few hints:HINT 1: one goal of the assignment is to strengthen the background and discussion sections of your project. So it’s totally OK and encouraged to write this in the format of the introduction or discussionof a scientific paper, and then integrate all of your teams literature syntheses into your Project 1 or Project 2 papers as appropriate. HINT 2: For technical or methodological papers, the Supplementary Information often has a much clearer description of the methods than themain text.HINT 3: You can cite papers in the middle of your text using the (authorname year) convention. For example,“BLAST (Altschul 1990) is a commonly used local alignment search algorithm”HINT 4: It can be helpful to skim many abstracts to get a sense of the types of papers out there on a topic before settling on which you want to read in detail.HINT 5: If you find one good paper, the references in its introduction and discussion may suggest additional papers to check out.Important addendum on academic honesty and synthesis :It goes without saying that to meet academic standards you must first read and take notes on the articles, then think about their content (leave time to do this). Thenbased on your thoughts, write about the article. Finally, it is OK to cross-check your writing with facts in the article after you have written it. What you must not do (which you no doubt already know) is totranscribe from papers and then modify the transcript. That’s plagiarism, obviously, even if you modify extensively. A single instanceof it gets folks thrown out of academic labs or graduate programs, fired from jobs etc (I’ve personally seen this happen, and it sucks). More to the point, it’s boring and produces writing with lots of buzzwords that makes literally no sense. The person it ultimately disrespects most is the writer themselves. I am much more interested in your ideas, how you think about the material and connect it to other things you know, where you seeopportunities, etc. It is far better to write a paper that isn’t great but reflects where you are with the material than to try to short-circuit the process. Often bad writing is a key step on the path to doing work which is great. If you are really thinking for yourself about the material carefully, your writing will progress quickly with a little revision. Please use this 3 articles:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/11/7/761/htmhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888754320320000https://academic.oup.com/bib/article/23/1/bbab382/6369601For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order NowRelated
This question has been answered exceptionally by https://essayblazers.com/
Place a similar order with a custom made answer.
Your privacy is our assurance as well as great grades.
Try us today, you will not regret!