LEARNING OUTCOMESUpon completion of this piece of coursework, a student will be able to:understand the functionality of Prolog predicates and express it in natural language;understand textual descriptions of predicates and design the corresponding Prolog programs;implement recursive predicates on lists consisting of complex terms;implement predicates exploiting the power of higher order built-in predicates;utilise procedural abstraction to decompose a complex predicate description into simpler ones andsynthesise complex predicates by reusing already defined built-in or user-defined predicates;develop correct and well-documented programs on specific problems, and test them.ASSESSMENT CRITERIAProgram correctness (code loads to Prolog with no warnings or error messages, correct use of recursion,procedural abstraction and built-ins, production of correct results for normal and boundary cases).Proper code documentation and meaningful variable and predicate names.Programming style (proper use of variable assignment, efficiency).Explanation of the provided code and justification of design choices.DETAILED DESCRIPTIONDescription of ISOLAThis is a two-player game. You start with a 7´7 position board, which initially contains two pieces, one for eachplayer. Both players (h for human and c for computer) flip a coin and whoever wins plays first. At each turn, aplayer can do two consecutive moves:· Move one’s own piece to a neighbouring position (horizontally, vertically or diagonally) that is empty(not crossed out).· Remove any position from the board by crossing it out.The looser is the player who cannot move its piece to a neighbouring position, i.e. the piece is isolated. There isno draw. The figure on the next page presents an instance of the game.Aim of the PracticalThe aim of this practical is to implement this game in Prolog. One player will be the human, and the other playerwill be the program, and in our case the computer always plays first. We are not concerned with the programbeing intelligent (at least not during this semester!) so the program will perform all its moves at random.
Questions1. What does the predicate pp/1 do and how? Would it matter if the board elements were messed up (notin order)? Would it be possible to write a recursive predicate that does the same operation? Again, wouldthe order of board elements matter?[10%]2. Write Prolog code for the predicate in_position/3, which given a number and a list of items, returnsthe item that corresponds to the position indicated by the number. For example:?- in_position (4, [a,b,c,d,e,f], X).X = d[10%]3. As it stands now, next/4 finds the neighbouring positions vertically and horizontally. Can you complete itto make it work for diagonal neighbours?[10%]4. As it stands now, computer always plays first. Can you modify the code, so that the human decides eitherwho plays first or if the first player is to be chosen at random?[10%]5. Write the definition of the predicate find_options/3, which given a position (X and Y coordinates) anda board, returns a list of all available neighbouring positions.[10%]6. Consider the partial definition of select_one_to_move/3 predicate. It is implemented for player h butnot for player c. Complete the definition so that player c selects in random an available position to move.[10%]7. Write the definition of the predicate select_a_position_to_cross/3 predicate so that either playerc or h selects an available position to cross out.[15%]8. The board of the game could be represented by alternative notations. For example:A list with 49 ordered places, i.e.:board([-,-, … -,-]).A list of seven lists of seven items each, i.e.:board([[-,-,-,-,-,-,-],…,[-,-,-,-,-,-,-]]).A set of facts, i.e.board((1,1),-).board((2,1),-).board((3,1),-).…board((7,7),-).What would be the pros and cons of such representations, considering code complexity for listmanipulation, ordering of list items, time and space efficiency, or any other factor you may think of?[10%]9. This game could have variations in scale:· It could be played in a smaller or bigger board, for example a 5´5 or a 11´11 board.· There could be more than 2 players.· It could be 3-dimensionalWhat changes, if any, would you perform in each of the above cases to the program in order to make itwork?
SUBMISSIONStudents are expected to:Submit a typewritten and well structured report that contains:The answers to the coursework questions, which should also include all student code listings(documented) together with a brief explanation and justification of the design choices made. DO NOTprint the entire Prolog code and save some trees! However you do need to include all parts thatyou have developed!Evidence that the program is working as a whole or partially, such as a log of a game or exampleProlog queries and their answers. You may include bugs that have been identified in the submittedcode but could not be fixed.References to other sources (if any).Upload their well documented Prolog program (the completed “Isola.pl” file), which should beloaded without any problems to the SWI-Prolog interpreter, under ‘Assignments’ in the unit’s page onMOLE. A well documented Prolog program should have:Comments above each predicate definition that contain the predicate specification(predicateName/arity), a declarative description of the predicates success conditions and use,possible side-effects (for example “the predicate displays on the user console the …”), solutionsreturned on backtracking, argument instantiation pattern, etc.Predicates, variables and constants with meaningful names.Correct indentation, i.e. clear separation between head and body of definitions, clear separation ofpredicate definitions, etc.IMPORTANT NOTE: Delayed submissions will not be accepted.NOTE
All sentences or passages quoted in this coursework from other people’s work should be specificallyacknowledged by clear cross-referencing to author, work and page(s). Failure to do this amounts toplagiarism and will be considered grounds for failure in this coursework. It is on the instructor’s discretion tocontact an oral examination, which will result to the award of the final grade to that particular piece ofcoursework.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more