deductive-or-inductive-arguments

Many arguments have been given throughout history for the existence or non-existence of a supreme being (God), or in philosophical terms a Greatest Possible Being. Over time these have gradually coalesced into a small number of basic arguments that have been debated, with slight variation, over time.Each argument assumes 4 basic ideas of what is required in order to be a Greatest Possible Being (GPB). It is generally accepted that, for something to be the Greatest Possible Being i.e. a being greater than which nothing else can be or can be imagined the 4 required qualifications are:Omnipotent: The being must be all-powerfulOmniscient: The being must be all-knowing (or know all that is possible to know)Omnibenevolent: All Good/Without EvilExistent (A thing that exists is greater than a thing which does not exist!)For each of the below arguments:Write the argument in standard form (state premises and conclusion), and thenLabel it as a deductive argument (seeking to establish that God logically must or must not exist), or an inductive argument (seeking to establish that it is likely that God does or does not exist).(note: Feel free to look up more on these arguments to help you make sense of them)
This question has been answered exceptionally by https://essayblazers.com/
Place a similar order with a custom made answer.
Your privacy is our assurance as well as great grades.
Try us today, you will not regret!