Cultural Commonplaces Speech Final, Revised Outline New Attempt Due Nov 21, 2021

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable ratesFor This or a Similar Paper Click To Order NowCultural Commonplaces Speech Final, Revised OutlineNew AttemptDue Nov 21, 2021 by 11:59pm Points 40 Submitting a file upload File Types doc, docx, and pdfOverviewIn this speech, you will provide an analysis of a cultural artifact using public identity as a critical lens. Your goal in this speech is to explain to your audience the basis for your critical judgment about the artifact.Plan/Outline Your SpeechThe body of the speech should back up your claim about the persuasiveness of the artifact. You may choose to divide it into 3 main points that go something like this:Point 1: Context. Describe the artifact, how it came into being historically and/or culturally. Some may find it easy to fit this in the intro for well known objects, but others may need to spend a main point on it.Point 2: Answer any of these questions that you find most relevant to addressing how the artifact intentionally or unintentionally persuades someone to think, believe, or act in certain ways. If you choose multiple questions, you may find they need to be split into 2 main points. Be sure to identify what those ways of thinking, acting and believing are:How does the artifact create/reinforce/undermine a community’s racial identity?How does the artifact create/reinforce/undermine a community’s beliefs/understanding of gender roles, identity, or sexual orientation?How does the artifact shape our understanding of citizenship, national, &/or religious identity?How does the artifact function in shaping public memory?How does the artifact create/reinforce/undermine a community’s social, economic, &/or power structures?You will find what you learned about narrative analysis, social movement studies, close textual analysis, dramatism, etc. to be useful here. So might your responses to the emailed questions from last week. Think about who the audience(s) is/are, What types of reasoning may be used in understanding the arguments, and what style/materials tell us.Point 3: Evaluate. What were the consequences or (potential) impact of the object? Were the purposes of the object fulfilled or contradicted by its persuasive stance? Were the principles behind it valid or good?Note: This speech (based on this outline) should last at least, but no more than, 6–8 minutes. You will be given a 15-second grace period on either end. This time limit is not a suggestion. It is a requirement, and points will be deducted if you go over or under the time limit.The object you analyze should be well known or easily shown to your audience. Your analysis should focus on claims made by the artifact on the audience in terms of the issue of public identity (race/gender/orientation, citizenship, or public memory). Additionally, your speech should inform us about the context of the artifact by presenting sufficient historical and cultural background for the audience in class. Ultimately, you should be presenting a clear and thoughtful argument about the object as something that can be understood as a material instance of rhetoric. This argument should not be limited to whether the object was merely aesthetic, functional, or in conversation with community standards, but should judge it according to the criteria of how it—intentionally or not—persuades someone to think, to act, or to believe in specific ways.Were the purposes of the object (assuming it had an intended purpose) fulfilled by its persuasive stance or contradicted?What were the consequences or potential impact of the artifact? Were the principles behind it valid?Rely on LogosThis assignment will rely on logos. Logos is one of the rhetorical proofs that lead to judgment by the audience. Logos is based on evidence and reasoning, language, and structure. Your analysis, given in a speech, will demonstrate how you use criticism as a form of civic engagement. What you believe to be the persuasive dimensions of the cultural artifact will demonstrate that you know how to be a critic involved in public life, that you know how to do criticism that is engaged in civic matters, and that this functions in ways that are important for the good of the public.Tools for Crafting the Outline and Being SuccessfulThe full sentence, preparation outline for your speech is worth 40 points.We have provided an outline shell Download outline shellMinimize File Previewthat will help you structure the body, introduction, and conclusion for your speech.The outline should be completed as a Word document and submitted here when you submit your video.The speech, as it is presented in the video you submit, is worth 160 points.Also review the evaluation criteria established by CAS for the assessment of all speeches.The time frame for completing and submitting your presentations is indicated on the course schedule.For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order NowRelated
This question has been answered exceptionally by https://essayblazers.com/
Place a similar order with a custom made answer.
Your privacy is our assurance as well as great grades.
Try us today, you will not regret!