Critique of level of evidence (LOE) grading5 ptsFull MarksCritique of evidence grading processes.2.5 ptsPartial MarksGives evidence ratings, but no description of what ratings are based on and/or if the ratings are appropriate (failure to describe why or why not)5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritique of guideline recommendations.10 ptsFull MarksCritique of guideline recommendations. Are they explicit, clearly stated, valid for practice? Reflect of value judgements about outcomes.5 ptsPartial MarksMinimal information given on value judgements and/or no description what judgements are based on.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritique of peer review process.5 ptsFull MarksCritique of peer review processes used and if they were appropriate. If no peer review used, then describe why this is a problem for validity of recommendations.1.88 ptsPartial MarksStudents states that no guideline peer review done, but fails to discuss why this is problematic.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritique of intent of use.5 ptsFull MarksDescribe intent of authors in providing these guidelines. Local, national, international use? Is the intent appropriate? Why or why not?2.5 ptsPartial MarksIntent of use described, but lacks detail as to why or why not intent is appropiate.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritique of clinical relevance of guideline to practice5 ptsFull MarksIdentify how the recommendations are clinically relevant in intended practice setting. Different from current practice? Are recommendations feasible? What resources are required? Costs of additional equipment needed.2.5 ptsPartial MarksStates recommendation is relevant or not relevant, but give minimal or lacks reasons for why or why not.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritique of outcome measures.5 ptsFull MarksDescribes how patient care outcomes or management outcomes could be measured. for each recommendation. Discuss how outcome measure provides evidence to support guideline or provide evidence for change of practice.2.5 ptsPartial MarksAddresses only some outcomes and does not provide information on how outcome measures could support use of recommendation or need for recommendation changes.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of overall evaluation of the guideline.15 ptsFull MarksSummarize the overall evaluation of the guideline. Main points of paper are addressed. Include discussion or level of evidence provided (or lack of) to support recommendations. Discuss author expertise, guideline development processes and validity. Summarize recommendations and fit of these in current practice, recommendations for further changes, feasibility in practice, and measurable outcomes.7.5 ptsPartial MarksMinimal discussion of overall evaluation of guideline. Does not include development processes, level of evidence, feasibility, outcomes or future needs in detail. Lacking comprehensive evaluation.15 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA style5 ptsFull MarksProfessional writing used. Includes all important elements of APA including title page, headings (Questions of Appendix are not section headings), citations, appropriate font, spacing, tables, references.2.5 ptsPartial MarksHas some elements of APA, but lacking some important elements of APA such as headings, font, spacing, title page, citations, references.0 ptsNo MarksMajority of APA elements are not addressed and/or are incorrect5 pts
This question has been answered exceptionally by
Place a similar order with a custom made answer.
Your privacy is our assurance as well as great grades.
Try us today, you will not regret!

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more